Premium pages left without account:

Auction archive: Lot number 5

Rudolf Stingel

Estimate
£1,000,000 - £1,500,000
ca. US$1,421,697 - US$2,132,545
Price realised:
£1,325,000
ca. US$1,883,748
Auction archive: Lot number 5

Rudolf Stingel

Estimate
£1,000,000 - £1,500,000
ca. US$1,421,697 - US$2,132,545
Price realised:
£1,325,000
ca. US$1,883,748
Beschreibung:

Property From an Important European Collection Rudolf Stingel Untitled 2014 oil and enamel on canvas 241.5 x 193.5 cm (95 1/8 x 76 1/8 in.) Signed and dated 'Stingel 2014' on the reverse.
Provenance Massimo De Carlo, Milan Acquired from the above by the present owner Exhibited Milan, Massimo De Carlo, Rudolf Stingel 16 September-8 November 2014 Video Rudolf Stingel Texture as Disruption "Both the celotex and the carpet painting see Rudolf Sitngel challenging the definition of authorship..." With Untitled (Topolino), Stingel had the canvas completed entirely by viewers to the gallery where it was initially installed, leaving it up to them to inflict their marks on the work’s surface. Untitled, having been created with a stencil, recalls the serialisation and mechanized modes of creation that defined pop art, but stands in direct opposition to the work of the multiple skilled artisans who used to produce such lavish Baroque and Rococo designs. Specialist Henry Highley expands upon what makes these works such important benchmarks in Stingel’s career. Catalogue Essay Chrissie Iles: 'the parameters of painting and architecture are turned inside out. The traditional qualities of painting... pictorialism, flatness, illusion, composition, and autonomy... become corrupted by a new symbolic framework, in which painting metamorphoses.' (Chrissie Iles, ‘Surface Tension’, in Exh. Cat., Chicago, Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, Rudolf Stingel 2007, p. 23) Rudolf Stingel’s fascinating Untitled asserts itself as one of the latest examples of the artist’s eagerly sought-after series of carpet works and a shimmering exploration of space, pattern and texture. Almost immediately, one is immersed into the unpredictable and uncertain surface of the canvas, as delicate ornamentation melts into geometrically-guided repetition. Swirling imprints and lively vines dominate the ornate textile relief, pierced by small and unique deviations, leaving room for a sense of painterly accident. These deviations provide an indelible trace of their human craftsmanship. Amidst the brilliance of the magenta hue and iridescent silver, imprints of medallions and floral motifs emerge, evoking the Baroque tapestries that inspired Stingel. The intricate craftsmanship associated with both the Baroque and Rococo is something Stingel personally experienced and even undertook growing up in the Italian Tyrol and Vienna, where he attended a high school that provided training in Baroque decorative church wood carving. The materiality of such work left a deep impression on the young artist, conferring upon him a deep appreciation for the richness of decoration and the synthesis of both pictorial and architectural space. There is a certain form of decadence in this work, with its decorative opulence, that serves as a reminder of a bygone world. At first, it seems we are no longer restrained by contemporary functionalism and minimalism, as the artist allows superfluous ornamentation to triumph once again. The re-purposing of these works, a carpet inverted from floor to ceiling, reinforces this idea of decorative excess. Yet as always with Stingel’s work, a contradicting duality exists. Opposing the sheer visual luxury of the canvas is the very method within which it was produced: the stencil. By applying paint through a stencil, Stingel is participating in the serialisation and mechanized modes of creation that superseded the work of the multiple skilled artisans who used to produce such lavish Baroque and Rococo designs. The semi-automatic methods used to create this work engender a readymade-esque sense of repeatability in it, which is juxtaposed against the craftsmanship of the original damask pattern Stingel appropriated for the piece. These varying factors conflate to produce a work that is at once both democratic and decadent, an ode to the artistic and the industrial. As Roberta Smith writes, 'For nearly twenty years Rudolf Stingel has made work that seduces the eye whilst also upending most notions of what, exactly, constitutes a painting, how it should be made and by whom.' Stingel has experimented with the medium of carpets for much of his career, c

Auction archive: Lot number 5
Auction:
Datum:
27 Jun 2016
Auction house:
Phillips
London
Beschreibung:

Property From an Important European Collection Rudolf Stingel Untitled 2014 oil and enamel on canvas 241.5 x 193.5 cm (95 1/8 x 76 1/8 in.) Signed and dated 'Stingel 2014' on the reverse.
Provenance Massimo De Carlo, Milan Acquired from the above by the present owner Exhibited Milan, Massimo De Carlo, Rudolf Stingel 16 September-8 November 2014 Video Rudolf Stingel Texture as Disruption "Both the celotex and the carpet painting see Rudolf Sitngel challenging the definition of authorship..." With Untitled (Topolino), Stingel had the canvas completed entirely by viewers to the gallery where it was initially installed, leaving it up to them to inflict their marks on the work’s surface. Untitled, having been created with a stencil, recalls the serialisation and mechanized modes of creation that defined pop art, but stands in direct opposition to the work of the multiple skilled artisans who used to produce such lavish Baroque and Rococo designs. Specialist Henry Highley expands upon what makes these works such important benchmarks in Stingel’s career. Catalogue Essay Chrissie Iles: 'the parameters of painting and architecture are turned inside out. The traditional qualities of painting... pictorialism, flatness, illusion, composition, and autonomy... become corrupted by a new symbolic framework, in which painting metamorphoses.' (Chrissie Iles, ‘Surface Tension’, in Exh. Cat., Chicago, Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago, Rudolf Stingel 2007, p. 23) Rudolf Stingel’s fascinating Untitled asserts itself as one of the latest examples of the artist’s eagerly sought-after series of carpet works and a shimmering exploration of space, pattern and texture. Almost immediately, one is immersed into the unpredictable and uncertain surface of the canvas, as delicate ornamentation melts into geometrically-guided repetition. Swirling imprints and lively vines dominate the ornate textile relief, pierced by small and unique deviations, leaving room for a sense of painterly accident. These deviations provide an indelible trace of their human craftsmanship. Amidst the brilliance of the magenta hue and iridescent silver, imprints of medallions and floral motifs emerge, evoking the Baroque tapestries that inspired Stingel. The intricate craftsmanship associated with both the Baroque and Rococo is something Stingel personally experienced and even undertook growing up in the Italian Tyrol and Vienna, where he attended a high school that provided training in Baroque decorative church wood carving. The materiality of such work left a deep impression on the young artist, conferring upon him a deep appreciation for the richness of decoration and the synthesis of both pictorial and architectural space. There is a certain form of decadence in this work, with its decorative opulence, that serves as a reminder of a bygone world. At first, it seems we are no longer restrained by contemporary functionalism and minimalism, as the artist allows superfluous ornamentation to triumph once again. The re-purposing of these works, a carpet inverted from floor to ceiling, reinforces this idea of decorative excess. Yet as always with Stingel’s work, a contradicting duality exists. Opposing the sheer visual luxury of the canvas is the very method within which it was produced: the stencil. By applying paint through a stencil, Stingel is participating in the serialisation and mechanized modes of creation that superseded the work of the multiple skilled artisans who used to produce such lavish Baroque and Rococo designs. The semi-automatic methods used to create this work engender a readymade-esque sense of repeatability in it, which is juxtaposed against the craftsmanship of the original damask pattern Stingel appropriated for the piece. These varying factors conflate to produce a work that is at once both democratic and decadent, an ode to the artistic and the industrial. As Roberta Smith writes, 'For nearly twenty years Rudolf Stingel has made work that seduces the eye whilst also upending most notions of what, exactly, constitutes a painting, how it should be made and by whom.' Stingel has experimented with the medium of carpets for much of his career, c

Auction archive: Lot number 5
Auction:
Datum:
27 Jun 2016
Auction house:
Phillips
London
Try LotSearch

Try LotSearch and its premium features for 7 days - without any costs!

  • Search lots and bid
  • Price database and artist analysis
  • Alerts for your searches
Create an alert now!

Be notified automatically about new items in upcoming auctions.

Create an alert