Premium pages left without account:

Auction archive: Lot number 18

Marlene Dumas

Estimate
US$900,000 - US$1,200,000
Price realised:
n. a.
Auction archive: Lot number 18

Marlene Dumas

Estimate
US$900,000 - US$1,200,000
Price realised:
n. a.
Beschreibung:

Marlene Dumas Evil Eye 1995-1997 Oil on canvas. 78 3/4 x 39 3/8 in. (200 x 100 cm.) Signed, titled and dated “Evil Eye. M Dumas. 1995/97” on the reverse.
Provenance Galerie Paul Andriesse, Amsterdam; Private Collection; Sale: Sotheby's, New York, Contemporary Art Day Auction, November 12, 2009, lot 394; Acquired from the above by the present owner Exhibited Gunma, Japan, Museum of Modern Art, Eight People from Europe, April – June 1998, no. 6 Catalogue Essay …on the one hand the work is very simple, you can see what is depicted. You don’t have to ask what is that? It is a human figure. But you still have to decide for yourself what is going on with its image. That confuses them. The relation of title to the image adds another layer of confusion, if they perceive the work as realism or literalism rather than something else. I like to play with this type of tension. MARLENE DUMAS (Marlene Dumas in conversation with Gavin Jantjes Amsterdam, December 15, 1996, reproduced in A Fruitful Incoherence: Dialogues with Artists on Internationalism, London, 1998, pp. 50-63) Evil Eye, 1994, is a stunning example of the work by acclaimed South African painter Marlene Dumas one of the most captivating and thought provoking artists working today. Through her focus on the human figure, Dumas joins together themes of sexuality, identity, race and personal lived experience with art historical precursors to produce a unique aesthetic perspective on the issues that pervade contemporary culture. Recalling the way in which famed German painter Gerhard Richter painted pictures from photographs throughout the 1960s and early 1970s, Dumas never works directly from reality but only from photographs. For, she believes, to copy reality is a useless pursuit since reality itself will always be more perfect than its copies. Like Richter, in this way, Dumas “has made the elusive and almost immaterial character of the photographic image the basis of her painting style” (B. Prendeville, Realism in 20th Century Painting, London, 2000, p. 212). Evil Eye illuminates Dumas’ interest in power and the defacing effects of the facades imposed by representation. The present work is a large-scale portrait painted with watercolor-like delicacy, the upper body of the figure obscured by a veil. The eyes, however, shine out through holes poked in the mask that has become the face. Though her surfaces do not share the same impasto gesture, her simultaneous use of transparency and opacity shares an affinity with Francis Bacon’s interest in the same. The evil eye is believed by many cultures to be a malevolent look that can bestow a curse on victims with a mere gaze. In order to protect oneself from its power, which can inflict misfortune or even injury, the wearing of a symbolic “third eye” will ward off the curse. This belief has resulted in a number of apotropaic talismans, or sacred objects, that have the power to turn away impending harm. The figure in the present lot wears a veil most commonly associated with women’s burqas, an all-enveloping cloak which conceals a woman’s form and protects her modesty. While we cannot directly identify any talismans on her body, her powerful gaze and strong stance suggest a powerful presence approaching. The watercolors and translucent paints Dumas uses for the skin and veil achieve multicolored, sheer layers that signify the covering up and revealing of evil that she experienced growing up. In her essay, “Painter as Witness,” art historian Cornelia Butler calls attention to how, “though actually quite bluish, as if stained by a dirty purple hand, the lily-white . . . belies a certain kind of white affliction: the damning complicity that binds every white person in South Africa to the legacy of apartheid” (C. Butler, “Painter as Witness,” Marlene Dumas Measuring Your Own Grave, Los Angeles, 2008, p. 62). Recalling that Apartheid involved the literal distinction between groups, many of Dumas’s generation were rudely awakened by the realization that their privileged, normal lives were founded on the deaths and oppression of others. In addition to making a political statement, Dumas expose

Auction archive: Lot number 18
Auction:
Datum:
12 May 2011
Auction house:
Phillips
New York
Beschreibung:

Marlene Dumas Evil Eye 1995-1997 Oil on canvas. 78 3/4 x 39 3/8 in. (200 x 100 cm.) Signed, titled and dated “Evil Eye. M Dumas. 1995/97” on the reverse.
Provenance Galerie Paul Andriesse, Amsterdam; Private Collection; Sale: Sotheby's, New York, Contemporary Art Day Auction, November 12, 2009, lot 394; Acquired from the above by the present owner Exhibited Gunma, Japan, Museum of Modern Art, Eight People from Europe, April – June 1998, no. 6 Catalogue Essay …on the one hand the work is very simple, you can see what is depicted. You don’t have to ask what is that? It is a human figure. But you still have to decide for yourself what is going on with its image. That confuses them. The relation of title to the image adds another layer of confusion, if they perceive the work as realism or literalism rather than something else. I like to play with this type of tension. MARLENE DUMAS (Marlene Dumas in conversation with Gavin Jantjes Amsterdam, December 15, 1996, reproduced in A Fruitful Incoherence: Dialogues with Artists on Internationalism, London, 1998, pp. 50-63) Evil Eye, 1994, is a stunning example of the work by acclaimed South African painter Marlene Dumas one of the most captivating and thought provoking artists working today. Through her focus on the human figure, Dumas joins together themes of sexuality, identity, race and personal lived experience with art historical precursors to produce a unique aesthetic perspective on the issues that pervade contemporary culture. Recalling the way in which famed German painter Gerhard Richter painted pictures from photographs throughout the 1960s and early 1970s, Dumas never works directly from reality but only from photographs. For, she believes, to copy reality is a useless pursuit since reality itself will always be more perfect than its copies. Like Richter, in this way, Dumas “has made the elusive and almost immaterial character of the photographic image the basis of her painting style” (B. Prendeville, Realism in 20th Century Painting, London, 2000, p. 212). Evil Eye illuminates Dumas’ interest in power and the defacing effects of the facades imposed by representation. The present work is a large-scale portrait painted with watercolor-like delicacy, the upper body of the figure obscured by a veil. The eyes, however, shine out through holes poked in the mask that has become the face. Though her surfaces do not share the same impasto gesture, her simultaneous use of transparency and opacity shares an affinity with Francis Bacon’s interest in the same. The evil eye is believed by many cultures to be a malevolent look that can bestow a curse on victims with a mere gaze. In order to protect oneself from its power, which can inflict misfortune or even injury, the wearing of a symbolic “third eye” will ward off the curse. This belief has resulted in a number of apotropaic talismans, or sacred objects, that have the power to turn away impending harm. The figure in the present lot wears a veil most commonly associated with women’s burqas, an all-enveloping cloak which conceals a woman’s form and protects her modesty. While we cannot directly identify any talismans on her body, her powerful gaze and strong stance suggest a powerful presence approaching. The watercolors and translucent paints Dumas uses for the skin and veil achieve multicolored, sheer layers that signify the covering up and revealing of evil that she experienced growing up. In her essay, “Painter as Witness,” art historian Cornelia Butler calls attention to how, “though actually quite bluish, as if stained by a dirty purple hand, the lily-white . . . belies a certain kind of white affliction: the damning complicity that binds every white person in South Africa to the legacy of apartheid” (C. Butler, “Painter as Witness,” Marlene Dumas Measuring Your Own Grave, Los Angeles, 2008, p. 62). Recalling that Apartheid involved the literal distinction between groups, many of Dumas’s generation were rudely awakened by the realization that their privileged, normal lives were founded on the deaths and oppression of others. In addition to making a political statement, Dumas expose

Auction archive: Lot number 18
Auction:
Datum:
12 May 2011
Auction house:
Phillips
New York
Try LotSearch

Try LotSearch and its premium features for 7 days - without any costs!

  • Search lots and bid
  • Price database and artist analysis
  • Alerts for your searches
Create an alert now!

Be notified automatically about new items in upcoming auctions.

Create an alert